The term “The New Covenant” is a title traditionally ascribed to a particular administration of the Covenant of Grace. As a matter of biblical nomenclature, what does the Bible say? Answer There is no text in the Bible that mandates we call the Johannine administration of the Covenant of Grace “The New Covenant,” & at no point does the Bible call it “The New Covenant” as a proper name/title. Objection The Bible itself calls it the new covenant (Luke 22:20; 1 Corinthians 11:25; Hebrews 8:8-13; Hebrews 9:15; Hebrews 12:24). 12:24. Answer This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood. ( Luke 22:20 , ESV) Yeshua is using as descriptor & refers to its usage in the OT. “I will make a new covenant…” The text uses the article *the* in Luke to emphasize that the promise was being fulfilled in their sight. He isn’t declaring the title of the covenant. He is pointing out that the time ...
Exodus 34: 6 - 9
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Exodus 34:6–9 (ESV): The Lord passed before him and proclaimed, “The Lord, the Lord, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness, 7 keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation.” 8 And Moses quickly bowed his head toward the earth and worshiped. 9 And he said, “If now I have found favor in your sight, O Lord, please let the Lord go in the midst of us, for it is a stiff-necked people, and pardon our iniquity and our sin, and take us for your inheritance.”
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Popular posts from this blog
Favorite Fallacies & Homosexuality
Thesis - The tradition bound view on homosexuality commits a number of logical, epistemic, & exegetical fallacies. 1- Is - Ought Fallacy - Human anatomy is said to provide a blueprint for sexual ethics. We examined this in my previous article. A moral “ought” is derived from a physical “is.” The disputant makes an illicit leap from what is to what ought to be. A classic example is the way some homosexuals defend their sexual ethics by appealing to their biology/genetics. 2 - Vicious Circularity - Human anatomy & physiology are raised to the status due a non-arbitrary epistemic warrant. A non-arbitrary epistemic warrant must be necessary, reasoned, & principled. In truth, the body is unnecessary to deduce sexual ethics. By way of contrast, God’s nature is definitionally necessary, insofar as God is a necessary being, &, since God is infinite, eternal, & unchangeable in being, w...
City Of God Study Module 2
Romans 1:18 - 32 & Leviticus 18
Paul is following the basic outline of a suzerain covenant in general & the outline of Lev. 18 in particular. Shema & Decalogue (Rom. 1:18 - 20) God’s Image testifies to His attributes & Law. God created people. His temple bears His Image & runs according to his Law & Gospel. This corresponds to Lev. 18 : 1 & 2. A - Rom. 1:18 - 19. God’s wrath falls on those who suppress His image. B - Rom 1:20 - For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made so that people are without excuse. What is the teleological intent of the created order? To serve as an epistemic warrant on par with God Himself? No! It’s purpose is to serve as a pointer to God who is Himself the only sufficient epistemic warrant for all faith & practice. ...
Comments
Post a Comment