The Church Is Failing Women - Part 4

Let’s look at Genesis:   Then the Lord God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.” 19 Now out of the ground the Lord God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name. 20 The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him. (Genesis 2:18 - 20, ESV) Why are the animals not fit helpers? In part, because although created first, they are governmentally inferior to him just as Adam is to God.   As to the immanent Trinity, the only fit helpers for God are God’s own hypostases.    Strictly speaking, we are not helpers — we are honored participants in the story of eternity, not authors co-equal to God.    God has no co-equals outside Himself.   Thus, th...
Post a Comment

The Sufficiency Of Scripture & The Rules Of Sound Reasoning (Part 5)

Does the Bible teach us the principles of sound reasoning?   Yes, it most certainly does. 

Here are some examples…


5 - Category Mistake/Error - A category mistake involves the conflation of the properties of two separate domains.  When defenders of the tradition-bound view depart from Romans 1:18 - 32 in order to import Genesis into the text, they inevitably conflate God’s decretal will (a descriptive domain) & God’s moral will (a prescriptive domain). 


By way of reply to that maneuver…

 

First, Paul is writing an inerrant & infallible commentary on Leviticus 18.  Leviticus 18 & Romans 1:18 - 32.   They even follow the same outline both generally & particularly.  Why would you run to Genesis to interpret Romans if Romans is commenting on Leviticus? 


It isn’t enough to read “sakab” in Leviticus as “to lie down & have sex,” at issue is the thought & purpose of the behavior in 18:22.  Words can be overspecified, & since Romans 1:26 - 27 explain Leviticus 18:22, and since the traditional view commits the fallacy of overspecification & results in a number of other logical, epistemic, & therefore exegetical/expositional fallacies the text of Leviticus 18:22 cannot refer to all homosexual thoughts, words, & deeds indiscriminately.  It can (and does) refer to culturally derived & purposed thoughts, words, & deeds.


Hemmed in by the text, what is the disputant to do?  How about running to Genesis 1 & 2 & Matthew 19?


That won’t do, insofar as in Matthew 19, Yeshua is answering a question about divorce, not heteronormativity.   In addition, according to the text, Yeshua doesn’t stop with the citation of Genesis.  Rather, having appealed to God’s decretal order, He then appeals to God’s moral order by way of alluding to texts like Deuteronomy 28, Jeremiah 3,  & Malachi 2.  In so doing, the text demonstrates sound reasoning processes for us.   Yeshua refrains from drawing an abstract moral principle solely from the state of God’s created order (God’s decretal will that determines what “Is”) by coupling it with God’s moral will (which prescribes what we should do, ie that which “Ought (to be)).  


Matthew 19 therefore teaches us not to conflate the properties of two separate (yet intersecting) domains.    The definition of a Category Mistake (Error when we factor in Hebrews 5 & moral problems that lead us to commit the mistake) is thusly vindicated. 


16 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work. (2 Timothy 3). 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Favorite Fallacies & Homosexuality

Thesis - The tradition bound view on homosexuality commits a number of logical, epistemic, & exegetical fallacies.  1-  Is - Ought Fallacy  - Human anatomy is said to provide    a blueprint for sexual ethics.  We examined this in my previous article.  A moral “ought” is derived from a physical “is.”  The disputant makes an illicit leap from what is to what ought to be. A classic example is the way some homosexuals defend their sexual ethics by appealing to their biology/genetics.  2 -  Vicious Circularity   - Human anatomy & physiology are raised to the status due a non-arbitrary epistemic warrant.    A non-arbitrary epistemic warrant must be necessary, reasoned, & principled.  In truth, the body is unnecessary to deduce sexual ethics. By way of contrast, God’s nature is definitionally necessary, insofar as God is a necessary being, &, since God is infinite, eternal, & unchangeable in being, w...
Read more

City Of God Study Module 2

            ✨ 👑 GALLIFREY 👑✨                       EDISON/ADONAI                           CAMBRIDGE BASTILLE & PLUME     SAGACITY & THORN                            Zodiac ICONOCLASTS LAW & ORDER         Bishop     Vanity Fair          Forge      Toymaker    Archibaptrix     Chameleon         Enigma     Governess         Corsair       Jodpurs         Sextant       Dauphin       Carnevale       Libertine           Arsenal                  Mosaic  ...
Read more

Covenant Theology In Outline Form (Part 1)

This is the general outline of a suzerain covenant. Shema/Preamble Historical Prologue General Stipulations Specific Stipulations  Renewal, Document Clause Witnesses Victory Statement This outline appears repeatedly in Scripture.    It makes for a helpful Study Guide.     We ought to pay careful attention when this outline appears, insofar as every major biblical covenant takes this form.    Here are some helpful thoughts. The Bible teaches the 3 uses of the Law (& Gospel).     Understanding the 3 uses of the Law helps us as we study Deuteronomy & the Sermon on the Mount.   As Moses delivered God’s Law from Sinai, so Yeshua reveals God’s Law with a Gospel slant from the Mount of Olives.  Deuteronomy :  Preamble (1:1-5) Historical Prologue (1:6 - 4:43) General Stipulations (4:44 - 11:32) Decalogue 5 : 1 - 21  Specific Stipulations (12:1 - 26:19) Renewal, Document Clause (27:1 - 30:20)  Witnesses ...
Read more