Psalm 107

Psalm 107  1  Oh give thanks to the Lord, for he is good, for his steadfast love endures forever! 2  Let the redeemed of the Lord say so, whom he has redeemed from trouble 3  and gathered in from the lands, from the east and from the west, from the north and from the south. 4  Some wandered in desert wastes, finding no way to a city to dwell in; 5  hungry and thirsty, their soul fainted within them. 6  Then they cried to the Lord in their trouble, and he delivered them from their distress. 7  He led them by a straight way till they reached a city to dwell in. 8  Let them thank the Lord for his steadfast love, for his wondrous works to the children of man! 9  For he satisfies the longing soul, and the hungry soul he fills with good things. 10  Some sat in darkness and in the shadow of death, prisoners in affliction and in irons, 11  for they had rebelled against the words of God, and spurned the c...
Post a Comment

The Food Laws As Inductive Prophecy

Statement:  Yeshua did not repeal the food laws, & we must abide by them today (or else we are in sin!)

Answer: Contrary to those who believe that the parenthetical statement is not authoritative or not as authoritative as the words of Christ Himself (which are actually the author’s words about what Christ said, the text clearly states He declared all foods clean (Mark 10:19). 


Acts 10 analogizes between food & people. The entire point of the vision is that the  Gentiles are now openly admitted to the covenant community on the basis of the vision, insofar as the food & the people directly correspond.   By drawing Peter’s attention to Gentiles now being “clean,” the vision also draws attention to the suspension of the food laws. 


The clean/unclean distinction in the OT  is given for 3 essential reasons, two of which are sacrifice & health.    Animal sacrifice is no longer required.  In the Common Era, we have moved on to more thorough cooking methods.   Thus, the 2nd reason behind the food laws is fulfilled via a functional equivalent. 


The 3rd reason is strategic & prophetic.  The food laws answer specific food related practices in the ancient world.   The binding rite in the hands of the Witch of Endor is sorcery.  In Ezekiel’s hands, it is prophecy that corresponds to her activities. The food laws operate the se way.     For the health & safety of the nation, God’s policy was one of abstention that emphasized health & holiness.


In 1 Corinthians, Paul does not prohibit eating food sacrificed to idols, thereby reforming the food laws.  Instead of answering sorcery & idolatry defensively via by abstention, the Christian tradition answers it offensively by engagement — which also corresponds to the reformation of the presentation of the Gospel which in the 1st century AD had become larded with works righteousness (cf. Romans 9:30 - 33).    


The Bible legalism & works righteousness.  Is man is made for the Sabbath, or is the Sabbath made for man?  According to Mark 2:23 - 28, the Sabbath is made for man.    This means that we are free to exercise discernment/wisdom & are allowed to alter & adapt our practices  with respect to concrete particulars as long as we abide by the abiding principles in the Law & Gospel.    The abiding principle is found in the first table of the Law, which concerns our relationship to God.   The concrete particular is found in the casuistic laws concerning food & the clean/unclean distinction.    


The food laws have been reformed.   If some decides to abide by the abstention policy then by all means they may do so — but not because God condemns & commends without regard to the motives of the heart, which at the heart of legalism & works righteousness.   Remember— some people think God condemns people’s dietary habits on the basis of the identity of their food. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Bible says He condemns & commends based on our motives not external factors like the origin of your meat (1 Samuel 16:7, Jeremiah 17:9 & 10, James 1:14 - 15, Matthew 5:27 - 28)


May God bless us all, each & every one, & “Go & sin no more.” 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Favorite Fallacies & Homosexuality

Thesis - The tradition bound view on homosexuality commits a number of logical, epistemic, & exegetical fallacies.  1-  Is - Ought Fallacy  - Human anatomy is said to provide    a blueprint for sexual ethics.  We examined this in my previous article.  A moral “ought” is derived from a physical “is.”  The disputant makes an illicit leap from what is to what ought to be. A classic example is the way some homosexuals defend their sexual ethics by appealing to their biology/genetics.  2 -  Vicious Circularity   - Human anatomy & physiology are raised to the status due a non-arbitrary epistemic warrant.    A non-arbitrary epistemic warrant must be necessary, reasoned, & principled.  In truth, the body is unnecessary to deduce sexual ethics. By way of contrast, God’s nature is definitionally necessary, insofar as God is a necessary being, &, since God is infinite, eternal, & unchangeable in being, w...
Read more

Covenant Theology In Outline Form (Part 1)

This is the general outline of a suzerain covenant. Shema/Preamble Historical Prologue General Stipulations Specific Stipulations  Renewal, Document Clause Witnesses Victory Statement This outline appears repeatedly in Scripture.    It makes for a helpful Study Guide.     We ought to pay careful attention when this outline appears, insofar as every major biblical covenant takes this form.    Here are some helpful thoughts. The Bible teaches the 3 uses of the Law (& Gospel).     Understanding the 3 uses of the Law helps us as we study Deuteronomy & the Sermon on the Mount.   As Moses delivered God’s Law from Sinai, so Yeshua reveals God’s Law with a Gospel slant from the Mount of Olives.  Deuteronomy :  Preamble (1:1-5) Historical Prologue (1:6 - 4:43) General Stipulations (4:44 - 11:32) Decalogue 5 : 1 - 21  Specific Stipulations (12:1 - 26:19) Renewal, Document Clause (27:1 - 30:20)  Witnesses ...
Read more

The Biggest Lie Told During Pride Month

Generally speaking, Mike Winger is a pretty good Christian apologist, but like many theologically Evangelical (& Non-Evangelical) Christians these days, his heart & mind are still in the thrall of Liturgical Philosophy & Ecclesiastical Tradition.  According to him , the other side of the ecclesiastical ideological aisle is guilty of lying this time of year.   He could not be more wrong.   In truth, the biggest Pride month lie is the tradition bound view on homosexuality.  The reader is invited to refute this by way of using the Bible only & commiting no exegetical, epistemic, & logical fallacies.  First, let’s outline the texts of Leviticus 18 & Romans 1:18 - 32 together in tandem.    Why?  Because Leviticus 18 is inerrant & infallible case law, & Romans 1:18 - 32 is verbal, plenary inerrant & infallible didactic material that follows the same outline & serves as an inerrant, infallible commentary on L...
Read more