Romans 1 & Sola Scriptura

Objection - The Bible doesn’t teach Sola Scriptura. The Church is necessary to make Scripture intelligible for the student/reader.  


By way of reply…


It isn’t infrequent for Roman Catholics & Orthodox apologists to raise this objection.  When you think about what they are saying, the sound very like Village Atheists who argue that human minds are required for numbers to exist & math to be intelligible.   It’s the same reasoning process:  suppress God’s image, ability, & authority, then look to one or more created (human) images for use as a sufficient epistemic warrant for faith & practice. 


The Protestant reply historically runs through 2 Timothy 3:16 - 17 & its declarations on the sufficiency & utility of Scripture.    That move is a valid one, but I think that it can be made stronger when part of a two-pronged approach that includes what Paul says about Scripture’s sufficiency & utility in 2 Timothy & what he teaches in Romans 1 about sound reasoning processes.  


Romans 1:18 - 32 is clear that God’s moral intention for the created order is for it to testify to His existence, attributes, & authority.    The text teaches us that humanity, consequent to the Fall, did openly & notoriously suppress God’s image & authority & supplant it with the own & that of other created images, and then humanity reasoned their theology, philosophy, & ethics accordingly. 


The Bible itself is the result of a theopneustos enterprise in which God & man collaborate & the result is an inerrant & infallible set of written documents published as universal Scripture.  The Bible therefore expresses the mind of God in matters of faith & practice, and since our minds are not necessary for these principles to exist, they inhere in God’s mind. 


The insertion of the Church as a necessary component for Scripture to be intelligible/understood is a classic example of suppressing God’s necessary, sufficient, sinless, holy, & just image $ authority & supplanting it with an image or set of images that is/are unnecessary, insufficient, errant, at times sinful, & known to be at times unjust / hypocritical.   The Church is just a collection of reasoned, principled minds none of which are necessary, ergo any ecclesiastical epistemology  that is not Sola Scriptura is definitionally heterodox & futile according to the most foundational principle of sound reasoning laid out in Romans 1. 


May God bless us all, each & every one, and “Go & sin no more.” 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Romans 1:18 - 32 & Leviticus 18

  Paul is following the basic outline of a suzerain covenant in general     & the outline of Lev. 18 in particular.   Shema & Decalogue (Rom. 1:18 - 20)  God’s Image testifies to His attributes & Law.    God created people. His temple bears His Image & runs according to his Law & Gospel.    This corresponds to Lev. 18 : 1 & 2. A - Rom.    1:18 - 19.  God’s wrath falls on those who suppress His image.   B - Rom 1:20  - For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made so that people are without excuse.  What is the teleological intent of the created order?    To serve as an epistemic warrant on par with God Himself? No!  It’s purpose is to serve as a pointer to God who is Himself the only sufficient epistemic warrant for all faith & practice....
Read more

Covenant Theology In Outline Form (Part 11)

Isaiah 6:1- 13 Shema   In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him stood the seraphim. Each had six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. And one called to another and said: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory!” And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. Historical Prologue   And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the  Lord  of hosts!” Then one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a burning coal that he had taken with tongs from the altar. And he touched my mouth and...
Read more

Covenant Theology In Outline Form (Part 9)

Part 9 - A King To Judge The Nations Monarchial/Davidic Covenant (1 Samuel 3, 1 Samuel 16, 2 Samuel 7, & 1 Chronicles 17 I Samuel 3 Shema  Now the boy Samuel was ministering to the Lord in the presence of Eli. And the word of the Lord was rare in those days; there was no frequent vision. 2  At that time Eli, whose eyesight had begun to grow dim so that he could not see, was lying down in his own place. 3  The lamp of God had not yet gone out, and Samuel was lying down in the temple of the Lord, where the ark of God was. Historical Prologue  4  Then the Lord called Samuel, and he said, “Here I am!” 5  and ran to Eli and said, “Here I am, for you called me.” But he said, “I did not call; lie down again.” So he went and lay down. 6  And the Lord called again, “Samuel!” and Samuel arose and went to Eli and said, “Here I am, for you called me.” But he said, “I did not call, my son; lie down again.” 7  Now Samuel did not yet know the Lord, and ...
Read more