The Principles Of Sound Reasoning

From a conversation I recently had on Instagram: 

Instead of accusing me of importing unbiblical or extrabiblical concepts into the text, try using the principles of sound reasoning & biblical hermeneutics— which the Bible itself underwrites & models for us.   Refrain from constructing an interpretive grid as if the reader must understand Genesis 1 & 2 & Mt. 19 to understand Leviticus 18 & Romans 1:18 - 32.   

Does the Bible allow us to reason from the (alleged) state of the created order?  No.  Why? Romans 1:20.    The image & attributes God alone are necessary, reasoned, & principled (thus a truly non-arbitrary epistemic warrant) for all faith (worship ethics/doctrine) & practice (moral, ethical, & philosophical reasoning). 

Does it allow us to commit Category Errors? No, God’s decretal will (What Is) & moral will (What Ought To Be) are separate (like His 3 Hypostases) yet perichoretic (like His hypostases), but they are not to be conflated with one another (like His 3 Hypostases). 

Does God allow us to reason in vicious circles?   No.   God’s image & authority (and its verbal, plenary expression) supply the necessary truth conditions to interpret reality.  The created order is insufficient & unnecessary.    Our bodies & minds are not required for ethics to exist — but God Himself is required. 

Does God engage in Special Pleading? No, His Law is part of who He is.   He judges us by our motives, not by appearances.  He plays by His own rules, which deny favoritism (James).    We rightly accuse gays who use their biogenetics/psyche to underwrite their sexual ethics of Is - Oughting, then we appeal to an embedded telelogical principle in the created order going back to Genesis for our sexual ethics & pat ourselves on the back.   In reality, we’re engaging in Special Pleading.  

The issue is the use of created order for ethical reasoning altogether — not merely the conclusions drawn from it.  

Importing all that Aristotelian Natural Theology into the text of Romans 1 commits Overspecification, & out of that these other fallacies follow.  The end result conduces the calling what God calls morally unnatural reasoning natural reasoning.  

The Bible models sound reasoning & the principles of biblical hermeneutics for us.  

God bless us all, each & every one, and “Go & sin no more.” 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Romans 1:18 - 32 & Leviticus 18

  Paul is following the basic outline of a suzerain covenant in general     & the outline of Lev. 18 in particular.   Shema & Decalogue (Rom. 1:18 - 20)  God’s Image testifies to His attributes & Law.    God created people. His temple bears His Image & runs according to his Law & Gospel.    This corresponds to Lev. 18 : 1 & 2. A - Rom.    1:18 - 19.  God’s wrath falls on those who suppress His image.   B - Rom 1:20  - For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made so that people are without excuse.  What is the teleological intent of the created order?    To serve as an epistemic warrant on par with God Himself? No!  It’s purpose is to serve as a pointer to God who is Himself the only sufficient epistemic warrant for all faith & practice....
Read more

Favorite Fallacies & Homosexuality

Thesis - The tradition bound view on homosexuality commits a number of logical, epistemic, & exegetical fallacies.  1-  Is - Ought Fallacy  - Human anatomy is said to provide    a blueprint for sexual ethics.  We examined this in my previous article.  A moral “ought” is derived from a physical “is.”  The disputant makes an illicit leap from what is to what ought to be. A classic example is the way some homosexuals defend their sexual ethics by appealing to their biology/genetics.  2 -  Vicious Circularity   - Human anatomy & physiology are raised to the status due a non-arbitrary epistemic warrant.    A non-arbitrary epistemic warrant must be necessary, reasoned, & principled.  In truth, the body is unnecessary to deduce sexual ethics. By way of contrast, God’s nature is definitionally necessary, insofar as God is a necessary being, &, since God is infinite, eternal, & unchangeable in being, w...
Read more

Covenant Theology In Outline Form (Part 11)

Isaiah 6:1- 13 Shema   In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him stood the seraphim. Each had six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. And one called to another and said: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory!” And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. Historical Prologue   And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the  Lord  of hosts!” Then one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a burning coal that he had taken with tongs from the altar. And he touched my mouth and...
Read more