The US Constitution As Covenant Theology

This  is the outline of a suzerain covenant: 


Preamble

Historical Prologue

General Stipulations

Specific Stipulations 

Renewal, Document Clause

Witnesses

Victory Statement

This is how the Constitution reads: 

Its Premable forms the Shema Statement & Historical Prologue.     

We the People … God includes Himself as a member/citizen of every nation. 

In order to form a more perfect union - points us to a specific time & place in US & Global History. 

Articles 1 - 6 are its General & Specific Stipulations

Article 7 forms the Document Clause, Witnesses, Covenant Establishment, & Victory Statement. 

Given the Preamble of more than one State Constitution @ the time & the fact that the Founding Fathers were not infrequently copacetic with State Churches at the time, those who argue that the US Constitution doesn’t rest on Judeo - Christian ideals sound like a know-it-all people who don’t know nearly as much as they think they do. 

Suzerain covenant form is plastered all over the text of both the OT & NT.   Saying that these words don’t come from & point to broadly Judeo-Christian values is like saying the Book of Esther says nothing about God because God’s name isn’t in the book, even though it is in the underlying text via acrostic & the entire book is about God’s providence.

The Framers probably didn’t realize that their words took this form, but nevertheless they do.    That’s easily demonstrated, so, if God didn’t not have a hand in its writing, then how is it that it takes the form of a suzerain covenant & it’s content is so very congruent with the principles of representative theology, philosophy, & ethics properly derived from a correct understanding of the Bible in terms of its exegesis, exposition, understanding, & application? 

Instead of arguing that the MAGA people are utterly wrong about their assertions about the relationship between the Judeo-Christian tradition & the US Constitution, it light of the form & content of the document & what was going on relative to civil religion in the late 18th Century in the US & the statements within State Constitutions then up to the present day, the better, more intelligent argument ought to seek to demonstrate that there is some truth to what those who act as if the Constitution is inspired writ believe — & that what the American Conservative movement in the present day has come to advocate & embody is incongruent with what Christians who say they believe in the inerrancy & infallibility of the Bible ought to believe as well as the Constitution’s own text.

O LORD, Hear our prayer(s)!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Romans 1:18 - 32 & Leviticus 18

  Paul is following the basic outline of a suzerain covenant in general     & the outline of Lev. 18 in particular.   Shema & Decalogue (Rom. 1:18 - 20)   God’s Image testifies to His attributes & Law.    God created people. His temple bears His Image & runs according to his Law & Gospel.    This corresponds to Lev. 18 : 1 & 2. A - Rom.    1:18 - 19.  God’s wrath falls on those who suppress His image.   B - Rom 1:20  - For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made so that people are without excuse.  What is the teleological intent of the created order?    To serve as an epistemic warrant on par with God Himself? No!  It’s purpose is to serve as a pointer to God who is Himself the only sufficient epistemic warrant for all faith & practice....
Read more

Covenant Theology In Outline Form (Part 11)

Isaiah 6:1- 13 Shema   In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him stood the seraphim. Each had six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. And one called to another and said: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory!” And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. Historical Prologue   And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the  Lord  of hosts!” Then one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a burning coal that he had taken with tongs from the altar. And he touched my mouth and...
Read more

Covenant Theology In Outline Form (Part 9)

Part 9 - A King To Judge The Nations Monarchial/Davidic Covenant (1 Samuel 3, 1 Samuel 16, 2 Samuel 7, & 1 Chronicles 17 I Samuel 3 Shema  Now the boy Samuel was ministering to the Lord in the presence of Eli. And the word of the Lord was rare in those days; there was no frequent vision. 2  At that time Eli, whose eyesight had begun to grow dim so that he could not see, was lying down in his own place. 3  The lamp of God had not yet gone out, and Samuel was lying down in the temple of the Lord, where the ark of God was. Historical Prologue  4  Then the Lord called Samuel, and he said, “Here I am!” 5  and ran to Eli and said, “Here I am, for you called me.” But he said, “I did not call; lie down again.” So he went and lay down. 6  And the Lord called again, “Samuel!” and Samuel arose and went to Eli and said, “Here I am, for you called me.” But he said, “I did not call, my son; lie down again.” 7  Now Samuel did not yet know the Lord, and ...
Read more