Is Matthew 22: 1 - 14 Incongruent With Calvinism?

No, not at all.  

Non-Calvinist:  God invites everyone else, both good and evil. They fill the wedding banquet but as you stated only one is cast out because they are not wearing the wedding clothes they should be wearing (Jesus’ righteous imparted by faith in Him).

Calvinist:  There are 3 sets of people in the King’s house. The King represents the Father. The Son getting married is the Son. The servants represent the Holy Spirit not just human evangelists. The King commands the servants to go & invite. The servants do not merely invite. They also gather. The text places no emphasis on the Elect’s decision to attend. 

When we see decision, the man ejected is in view. Unlike the others, he appears predisposed to attend via his commitment to works righteousness. The text implies he is an infiltrator/advocate for the people the King wrathed earlier in the story. 

The text also draws a sharp contrast between those who were initially invited - people of power & influence & the 2nd group, good & bad, people from all walks of life. This draws a distinction between those who believe in works righteousness & those who do not.

If faith & repentance precede regeneration, then faith & repentance are necessary & sufficient acts that serve to merit regeneration & justification. That’s works righteousness, which the text clearly denies.

In addition, to argue that faith precedes regeneration is to argue in favor of libertarian free will. Where does the Bible teach LFW is how our decisional mechanism works?  Nowhere. 

James 1:14 - 15 teaches us that we follow our desires into sin & death, & in 1 Samuel 16:7, Jeremiah 17:9 - 10; & Matthew 5:27 - 28 all teach us that God judges us via His evaluation of our desires that underwrite our thoughts, words, & deeds — not the mere performance of thoughts, words, & deeds. The LORD evaluates the morality of our thoughts, words, & deeds via His knowledge, evaluation, & understanding of our internal volitional mechanism & the heighth, depth, & breadth of our love for Him first, then everyone & everything else next, & then ourselves in that order. 

O LORD, Hear our prayer(s)! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Romans 1:18 - 32 & Leviticus 18

  Paul is following the basic outline of a suzerain covenant in general     & the outline of Lev. 18 in particular.   Shema & Decalogue (Rom. 1:18 - 20)   God’s Image testifies to His attributes & Law.    God created people. His temple bears His Image & runs according to his Law & Gospel.    This corresponds to Lev. 18 : 1 & 2. A - Rom.    1:18 - 19.  God’s wrath falls on those who suppress His image.   B - Rom 1:20  - For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made so that people are without excuse.  What is the teleological intent of the created order?    To serve as an epistemic warrant on par with God Himself? No!  It’s purpose is to serve as a pointer to God who is Himself the only sufficient epistemic warrant for all faith & practice....
Read more

Favorite Fallacies & Homosexuality

Thesis - The tradition bound view on homosexuality commits a number of logical, epistemic, & exegetical fallacies.  1-  Is - Ought Fallacy  - Human anatomy is said to provide    a blueprint for sexual ethics.  We examined this in my previous article.  A moral “ought” is derived from a physical “is.”  The disputant makes an illicit leap from what is to what ought to be. A classic example is the way some homosexuals defend their sexual ethics by appealing to their biology/genetics.  2 -  Vicious Circularity   - Human anatomy & physiology are raised to the status due a non-arbitrary epistemic warrant.    A non-arbitrary epistemic warrant must be necessary, reasoned, & principled.  In truth, the body is unnecessary to deduce sexual ethics. By way of contrast, God’s nature is definitionally necessary, insofar as God is a necessary being, &, since God is infinite, eternal, & unchangeable in being, w...
Read more

Covenant Theology In Outline Form (Part 11)

Isaiah 6:1- 13 Shema   In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him stood the seraphim. Each had six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. And one called to another and said: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory!” And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. Historical Prologue   And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the  Lord  of hosts!” Then one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a burning coal that he had taken with tongs from the altar. And he touched my mouth and...
Read more