Calvinism & The Salvation of Infants

1. From the beginning a few held with Zwingli that death in infancy is a sign of election, and hence that all who die in infancy are the children of God and enter at once into glory. After Zwingli, Bishop Hooper was probably the first to embrace this view. It has more lately become the ruling view. 2.    At the opposite extreme a very few held that the only sure sign of election is faith with its fruits, and, therefore, we can have no real ground of knowledge concerning the fate of any infant; as, however, God certainly has his elect among them too, each man can cherish the hope that his children are of the elect. Peter Martyr approaches this sadly agnostic position. 3.Many held that faith and the promise are sure signs of election, and accordingly all believes and their children are certainly saved; but the lack of faith and the promise is an equally sure sign of reprobation, so that all the children of unbelievers, dying such, are equally certainly lost. The younger Spanheim...
Post a Comment

Tongues Have NOT Ceased

I recently responded to a man who says tongues have ceased.   This is my reply; 

Do you hear yourself?  On the one hand, tongues were real human languages, & on the other, they have ceased. 

How so?  Tongues as real human languages is multilingualism.  

The gist of what Paul has to say about them in 1 Corinthian letter conduces to:  

One the problems in your church is the spirit of division.  

Another is disorderly worship.   People speak out of turn & it can get of of hand.  

Your church is part of the Roman Empire, & in the Empire, people speak Greek, Latin, Hebrew, Aramaic, Egyptian, & many other languages.  That’s how the Empire manages communication, business, & justice. 

Your church reflects the world, not only as to your moral problems, but also as to your linguistic composition.   

When you receive a visitor who speaks a language nobody there knows or understands, he prophesies to his own edification.  It would be better if he or she had someone among you who could paraclete them as their translator.   If not, let that individual be silent & find ears to participate. 

That said, just as those of stronger conscience are responsible for helping those of weaker conscience in any number of matters like eating food sacrificed to idols & restoring orderly worship relative to male-female ecclesiastical & familial relationships, those who have a gift for communication in general & learning & understanding languages in particular have a duty & responsibility, if possible to learn the language of the stranger/visitor in order to grow as a church & teach each other as time goes on.


For at that time I will change the speech of the peoples to a pure speech that all of them may call upon the name of the Lord and serve him with one accord.

10  From beyond the rivers of Cushmy worshipers, the daughter of my dispersed ones,shall bring my offering.

11  “On •that •day you shall not be put to shamebecause of •the deeds •by which you have rebelled against me; for then I will remove from your midst your proudly exultant ones, and you shall no longer •be haught in my holy mountain.

12  But I will leave in your midst a people humble and lowly; They shall seek refuge in the name of the Lord,

13  those who are left in Israel; they shall do no injustice and speak no lies, nor shall there be found in their mouth a deceitful tongue.  For they shall graze and lie down,and none shall make them afraid.” ((Zephaniah 3:9–14, ESV)

The Bible itself has been preserved & translated in many many languages.  Today, if someone desires to travel abroad as a missionary, they do well to learn the language & the culture of the people to whom they are sent.   

This gift of the Spirit is therefore most certainly still with us today.   When it was the right time, Christ came to die for us.   There’s a reason we call the past 2000 years the Common Era.   What began in Acts 2 has spread throughout the Table of Nations & remains with us today. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Favorite Fallacies & Homosexuality

Thesis - The tradition bound view on homosexuality commits a number of logical, epistemic, & exegetical fallacies.  1-  Is - Ought Fallacy  - Human anatomy is said to provide    a blueprint for sexual ethics.  We examined this in my previous article.  A moral “ought” is derived from a physical “is.”  The disputant makes an illicit leap from what is to what ought to be. A classic example is the way some homosexuals defend their sexual ethics by appealing to their biology/genetics.  2 -  Vicious Circularity   - Human anatomy & physiology are raised to the status due a non-arbitrary epistemic warrant.    A non-arbitrary epistemic warrant must be necessary, reasoned, & principled.  In truth, the body is unnecessary to deduce sexual ethics. By way of contrast, God’s nature is definitionally necessary, insofar as God is a necessary being, &, since God is infinite, eternal, & unchangeable in being, w...
Read more

Romans 1:18 - 32 & Leviticus 18

Paul is following the basic outline of a suzerain covenant in general     & the outline of Lev. 18 in particular.   Shema & Decalogue (Rom. 1:18 - 20)   God’s Image testifies to His attributes & Law.    God created people. His temple bears His Image & runs according to his Law & Gospel.    This corresponds to Lev. 18 : 1 & 2. A - Rom.    1:18 - 19.  God’s wrath falls on those who suppress His image.   B - Rom 1:20  - For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made so that people are without excuse.  What is the teleological intent of the created order?    To serve as an epistemic warrant on par with God Himself? No!  It’s purpose is to serve as a pointer to God who is Himself the only sufficient epistemic warrant for all faith & practice.  ...
Read more

I Corinthians 6: 9 - 11

What is really going on in 1 Corinthians 6:9 - 11? 1 Corinthians 6:9–11 (ESV): Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.  1.    The sin list is a list of sins operative in that church.  2. This text comes after a series of statements that highlight the identity and position in Christ of the members of the Corinthian church. 3. 1 Corinthians 6:11 (ESV): And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.  “Such were some of you,” does not mean that the...
Read more